#Spinoza Electrrcal Tuirn. The “fabolous” acording to GÖDEL UNDECDABABLE Propositin. “THISPROPSITON IS UNPRVABLE ” is as UNDECADABLE decidable, because the RERAL CONTRDTCORTY OPPSITE, NEGATION : “THI PROPSION IS PROVABLE” is as PRVABLE DECIDAL a VIRZA pof THIS PROPOSITUIBIS TRUE dquis “This TRUE PROPSITION is”, wgi is TRUE a daddion TRUTH VALUE for th addioon TRUHH FUNCTION of t hpropsion,THRF “THIS FALSE PROPSITION” is FALSE a propstional FUNCTION. OF coues”THIPRIONids DECUDADABLE” is as VRA og “THIS TRUE PROPOSITON IS”. The makinhg rdicoulöus pllemics gans “Metphaphyscal” TRUTH asnoit secptval su zejh RDICLOUS IN ITSELG; REGARDING the “COSTS” for thge “accused” METAPFSYVINS and mataj mathamtscias, ths shpould be makr clkrsas somn and clear asüpossible., DR. r. nat. Harald Wenk NOTE taht even SCHIZOPHTRENIA DIAGNOSTICS are among the “Costs”,s zaj FOUVAIUL an DELEUT/GUTTRI tacled sucesssfully the problem ‹ drhwenk ‹ Reader — WordPress.com

#Spinoza Electrrcal Turn. The “fabolous” according to GÖDEL UNDECIDABABLE Proposition. “THIS PROPSITON IS UNPROVABLE ” is as UNDECADABLE decidable, because the RERAL CONTRADICOTORY OPPOSITE, NEGATION : “THIS PROPSION IS PROVABLE” is as PROVABLE DECIDABLE as VARIANT of THIS PROPOSITION IS TRUE  equal to: “This TRUE PROPSITION is”, which is TRUE as addional TRUTH VALUE for the addion TRUTH FUNCTION of the proposition, THHERFORE:  “THIS FALSE PROPSITION is" is  FALSE as propstional FUNCTION. OF course ”THIS PROPSITION is DECIDADABLE” is as VARIANT of “THIS TRUE PROPOSITON IS” decidable too. . The making rdicoulus polemics against “Metphaphysical” TRUTH as not secptical  isthus  RIDICOLOUS  ITSELF. REGARDING the “COSTS” for the “accused” METAPHYSICIANS"  and  mathamtscias, this spould be made clear  a soon and  and clear as possible., Dr. rer. nat. Harald Wenk NOTE that even SCHIZOPHTRENIA DIAGNOSTICS are among the “costs”,so that FOUCAULT and DELEUZE/GUATTARI tackled sucesssfully the problem ‹ drhwenk ‹ Reader — WordPress.com

 

 #Spinoza Electrrcal Tuirn. The “fabolous” acording to GÖDEL UNDECDABABLE Propositin. “THISPROPSITON IS UNPRVABLE ” is as UNDECADABLE decidable, because the RERAL CONTRDTCORTY OPPSITE, NEGATION : “THI PROPSION IS PROVABLE” is as PRVABLE DECIDAL a VIRZA pof THIS PROPOSITUIBIS TRUE dquis “This TRUE PROPSITION is”, wgi is TRUE a daddion TRUTH VALUE for th addioon TRUHH FUNCTION of t hpropsion,THRF “THIS FALSE PROPSITION” is FALSE a propstional FUNCTION. OF coues”THIPRIONids DECUDADABLE” is as VRA og “THIS TRUE PROPOSITON IS”. The makinhg rdicoulöus pllemics gans “Metphaphyscal” TRUTH asnoit secptval su zejh RDICLOUS IN ITSELG; REGARDING the “COSTS” for thge “accused” METAPFSYVINS and mataj mathamtscias, ths shpould be makr clkrsas somn and clear asüpossible., DR. r. nat. Harald Wenk NOTE taht even SCHIZOPHTRENIA DIAGNOSTICS are among the “Costs”,s zaj FOUVAIUL an DELEUT/GUTTRI tacled sucesssfully the problem