#Spinoza  Electrical Turn. 

"This propdsittion is false":


An "reductio ad absurdum proof" that, for PROFESSIONAL MATHMTICAL LOGIC  PROOF THEORY  "This propsition is TRUE" maybe ANTI_GÖDELIANM decided as decidable,provable ,thuds   as TRUE as,

"This proposition is" 

is correctly, already  identfied with

"This prposition is", is TRUE

In BOOLEAN FIELD ALGEBRA Logic,


The difference of  TRUE and FALSE is like BEING andf NOTHING, wrote  #Spinoza, which is 

ANTI-HEGLIAN LOGIC from the Begining (Double meaning)


"This  proposition is False":=

"There is NO such thing like a proposition written here" 

 "Self-denial", so to speak! -METAlevel consideration! lIke Galaeis withdraw,the rerakmother denial o fdenialinin King Salomons case. The LIE TO LIE, It is FALSE THAT!!!!!!!!!!! it is FALSE!!


HJELMSEV "grid"_ CONTENT(Hjelmsev-substance, form)("intensional"  - ERXPRESSION((Hjelmsev-substance, form)("extensional") 

0 0 

0*0=0+0=0

 ZERO ZEROs 

Solution: "Only words"  expession

(2, TWO  ZEROds as EXpessioi for NOTHING, EMPTYSET  as CONTENT,   

"self-referetial" . ONLYWORDS, NOTHING, EMPTYSET convient outsidw the intellect!(#Spinoza ) 



In BOOLEAN LOGIC, "internalzing" (into the"domain) the FALSE as"outer" propstionalFunction VALUE (the image):
"THIS propsotin is NOT!" = "This proposition is" is False",the only REALLY senseful(emphathical) reading of "This proposition is False"

which

 ia palinly simply FALSE as IMGA Value of TRUTH propsitinal functin. Taking the domain for the graph of the truth propsitional function!

TALKNG PART 8THesUbject for th propsition grammzticaslly simluteosl,in te sam regar at te samtime and polace) as the WHOLE SIMUTEOULY like in HOLY TRINITY GOD,JESIS;HOLY spirit: That's what izt is all about (escpj fromTRINITY COLLEGE itself"=)

 

It ought to be,in "philosophcal grammar" aigainst Wittgwenstein and CARNAP,beside the "vicous circle principle2ofRUsell,Poincare,Kutschera:! !! This Propostion is, is false, is false. 

This porosition is, which is false, which is false.

 After INSPIRED by #Spinoza and Foucault,Deleuze/Guattari (Chatelet

Kommentare

  1. you ned t CRETA to avoid t h superflous voidnes of t self refretial,whicv i ha already trie dtopublsi scin yearts,but my tEX ARE SABOTWETD EVEN OFFLINE:; HER IN MX FLSAT; AT HH UNVDEITXY AT H INTENT CAFS THE BIBLIOTHEQIUE:.. EVRY Whsr, on th tablet .

    AntwortenLöschen

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog